โ† All six problems ยท 6 of 6

Sound familiar?

Improvements fade when the project ends

When your last improvement project wrapped up, did the change still exist six months later? If measurement activity consistently outweighs improvement activity, you're tracking a problem more carefully than you're solving it.

What this usually looks like

60%+
of FDA warning letters cite inadequate corrective and preventive action (CAPA) systems - the most commonly flagged quality-system gap in regulated industries
Source: FDA warning letter analysis (illustrative, US data); MHRA reports a similar pattern in UK GMP inspections
<1/3
of transformations both improve performance and sustain it over time
Source: McKinsey, cited via StrategyU

An improvement that isn't embedded in the day-to-day Nonconformance Report / Opportunity For Improvement (NCR/OFI) system isn't really embedded. Consolidating nonconformance, OFI and corrective action tracking into one framework is what turns a set of isolated fixes into a system that actually holds.

Is this you?

Potential solutions

Support engagement with nonconformance, root cause analysis (RCA) and other improvement tools
Build improvement apps and processes that scale and surface trends
Support for facilitating complex RCAs
Highlight where improvement activities should follow from measurement activities
Make lessons learned a living concept, not a static register
Ensure automation is properly scoped so the real constraint is understood before automating around it

Case studies

Examples specific to sustained improvement are being added to this page.

Coming soon

We're adding case studies for this problem area. In the meantime, ask us directly about relevant experience.

Take it with you

Not sure where the problem starts?

Tell us about your organisation and what you're trying to improve. It helps us tailor our response to what actually matters to you.

Take the Survey โ†’